Article · Scientific communications

OPINION: CONCEPTUALIZING EXTERNAL INTERFERENCE IN DECISION-MAKING PROCESS AND EFFORTS TO MAINTAIN THE AUTONOMY OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

MARGINEANU Elena

Author
MARGINEANU Elena
Section
Scientific communications
Pages
77-85
JEL classification
K33; K41; R20
Universal Decimal Classification
341.29.009(100); 34(4/9)

Author information

MARGINEANU Elena. - PhD in Law, University Lecturer, Free International University of Moldova (ULIM), (Chisinau, Republic of Moldova)

ORCID margineanu.elena@gmail.com

Keywords

external support, foreign entities, non-governmental organizations, autonomy, national interest, economic development, education

Abstract

The trajectory of a developing country is marked by decisions that mitigate or aggravate its economic decline. Along the way, politicians have been influenced by groups with access to multiple levers of pressure on state institutions on the one hand, or community manipulation on the other. Transformations in forms of governance, populism and the presence of foreign forces in the decision-making process are themes of continuous reflection. External interventions have been presented as moves initiated by the intention of working together for development, but the sustainability of the proposed solutions may increasingly be subject to contradictory discussions. The association of certain ideologies with corruption has led to political skepticism and the normalization of the presence of foreign institutions has changed public perceptions. Civil society and NGOs have gained influence and the integration of foreign organizations into national decision-making has evolved into an 'industry' dependent on external funding. Projects have heightened the perception of permanent crisis, fueling dependence on external assistance. External influence manifests itself not only economically and politically, but also through cultural and informational mechanisms, making independent education essential for maintaining national autonomy. The shaping of public opinion through media and academic structures can marginalize certain perspectives, and censorship, although misrepresented as a protection of human rights and democracy, can become a tool to control information and freedom of opinion